CHEMICAL AGENTS Contact Poisons: A Brief Touch

By Andrew Robertson In   Issue Volume 13 No. 2 Doi No https://doi-ds.org/doilink/04.2023-39671179/JMVH Vol 13 No 2

INTRODUCTION

GAIL BELL, IN HER BOOK “THE POISON PRINCIPLE”, tries to establish why people use poison2. She looks back over the centuries, from Cleopatra and Socrates to more modern poisoners like Crippen, and speculates that, with advanced analytical technology, the heyday of poisons is over2. But is it?

Contact poisons are those chemicals and toxins which are absorbed in sufficient quantities by direct skin contact to produce toxic effects, including death, in an individual. The popular media, literature and film commonly portray the use of contact poisons to murder various individuals. This perception has been reinforced by some relatively recent criminal trials. In May 1991, members of the Minnesota Patriots Council procured a ricin kit from an anarchist source. The kit included instructions on how to mix the ricin with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to produce a poison, which would be absorbed across the skin when the victim contacted it.

In the subsequent trial, the FBI expressed doubts about the ability of DMSO to carry ricin across the skin into the bloodstream because of the toxin’s high molecular weight. In April 1997, Thomas Leahy was arrested in Wisconsin for possession of ricin. According to the Assistant U.S. Attorney, police also discovered three spray bottles containing a mixture of nicotine and DMSO.

While the majority of these cases are of academic (or in some cases, literary) interest, military physicians should be aware that there are contact poisons which may produce morbidity if not mortality. These poisons are of far more concern from an industrial health viewpoint than they are as an intentional poison. The recent F-1ll Seal-Reseal Board of Inquiry dealt with a number of chemicals, some of which could be absorbed through the skin. This paper will look at various chemical agents, of military, industrial or agricultural interest, which fall into the category of contact poisons.

PERCUTANEOUS TOXICITY

The skin is an important portal of entry for many chemical substances. The two most important factors affecting absorption are the concentration of the applied chemical and the surface area of contact. Percutaneous toxicity is enhanced by delivering the largest concentration of agent over the greatest area. Percutaneous uptake will also usually increase if the skin has been damaged by the chemical.  Other important factors are the solvent used to deliver a chemical, the site of application (e.g. scalp is 4 times more porous than the hand), the condition of the skin (e.g. DMSO dissolves lipids), the frequency of application,6 age, race and the general hydration of the skin7. Areas of greater hydration have greater absorption.

DISCUSSION

Nerve agents, particularly VX, soman (GD) and GF, remain the quintessential contact poisons. Fortunately, they are generally difficult to either manufacture or procure. Other chemicals, whilst not having the extreme toxicity of the nerve agents, are more available industrially or agriculturally and are toxic enough to cause death, generally within a week. Both the organophosphate (TEPP, Parathion) and organochlorine pesticides (Chlordane, Endrin) are sufficiently toxic to cause death and have been implicated in a number of industrial and accidental deaths8-14. Other agents which pose a danger as contact poisons include organic solvents (carbon tetrachloride), explosive-related chemicals (nitroglycerin, ethylene glycol dinitrate), industrial dyes and related chemicals (aniline, benzidine, Loluidine), and assorted other chemicals (carbon disulfide, ethylene chlorohydrin, dimethyl sulfate, glycolonitrile, nicotine).8-14 Nicotine and aniline, particularly, have been responsible for a number of accidental contact poisonings12. Many of these agents have a noticeable odour which may, fortunately, discourage prolonged contact. Most are, however, commonly used in industry or commercially. Generally, the various toxins, plant poisons, toxic gases and poisonous metals are very poorly absorbed transdermally and pose a greater risk as ingestional or inhalational poisons.

DMSO

One interesting area of current research in the pharmaceutical industry is the development of drug delivery systems, which enhance the percutaneous absorption of various drugs7. These agents include Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO), Azone (Laurocapram), Propylene glycol and N-methyl pyrrolidone. Solvents such as DMSO can facilitate the penetration of toxicants through the skin by increasing the permeability of the barrier layer of the skin’s, principally by disrupting the lipid layers.

A number of these solvents are commercially available. While this is maybe effective in improving the absorption of relatively simple organic molecules, like carbon tetrachloride, the percutaneous absorption of complex molecules like toxins utilising such solvents is expected to be very limited. Leahys alleged mixture of DMSO and nicotine, however, could be a very effective contact poison.

CONCLUSION

Although contact poisons remain a favourite of crime fiction writers, they should not be dismissed as a mere literary device. Many military, industrial and agricultural chemicals pose a contact risk. Medical officers should be aware of the possible morbidity from such agents and should consider taking a detailed industrial commercial exposure history, particularly where there are non­ specific health complaints in an industrial setting. Rapid identification and management may prevent long term damage and possible death.

Author Information

References

  1. Glaister J. The power of poison. London: Christopher Johnson; 1954.
  2. Bell G. The poison Sydney: Pieador; 2001.
  3. Tucker JB. Toxic Terror: Assessing terrorist use of chemical and biological weapons. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000.
  4. Transcript of United States of America v Douglas Allen Baher and LeRoy Charles Wheeler; Feb23 1995, p. 162.
  5. Crus S. Bioterrorism and biocrimes: The illicit use of biological agents in the 20th Century. Washington: National Defence University; 1999.
  6. Ballanty ne B, Marrs T, Turner P (Eds). General and applied toxicology. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 1995.
  7. Tarcher AB. Principles and practice of environmental medicine. New York: Plenum Medical Book Company: 1992.
  8. Dreisbach RH. Handbook of poisoning (8th Ed.). Los Altos: Lange Medical Publications; 1974.
  9. International Labour Office. Encyclopaedia of health and safety. Geneva: ILO; 1983.
  10. Klassen CD, Amd ur MO, Doull J (Eds.). Casarcll and Doull's Toxicology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company; 1986.
  11. Hallenbeck WH, Cunningham-Burns KM. Pesticides and human health. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
  12. Stevens SD, Klarner A. Deadly doses. Cincinnati: Writers Digest; 1990.
  13. National Library of Medicine. Washington: NLM; 2001.
  14. Trevethick RA. Environmental and industrial health hazards. London: William Heineman; 1985.
  15. Amdur MO, Doullj, Klaasen CD. (eds). Casarell and Doull's Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991.

Acknowledgements

Reader Feedback