Paediatric aeromedical transport and hypoxia

By Jeffrey Stephenson In   Issue Volume 18 No. 3 Doi No https://doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2021-66556497/JMVH Vol 18 No 3

Introduction
Paediatric patients have different anatomical and physiological parameters when compared to the adult population.  These differences are consistent and well described1, with some of them rendering the infant more susceptible to hypoxia2.  Aeromedical staff require a sound knowledge of these differences to properly treat the paediatric patient.

Paediatric anatomy and physiology
Paediatric body mass and morphology
Paediatric patients have lower body mass, less fat and connective tissue, and are morphologically different to adults1.  In addition, their vital organs are in close proximity to the skin and the head is proportionally larger.  The surface area to volume ratio is highest at birth and decreases as the child grows.  This high ratio results in greater loss of thermal energy, and the paediatric patient is more prone to hypothermia1.

Respiratory
Paediatric patients also have significantly different respiratory parameters to adults.  They have higher respiratory rates, ranging from 40 to 60 breaths per minute in the infant, whereas an older child breathes 20 times per minute1.  Spontaneous tidal volumes vary from six to eight mL/kg1.  For the apnoeic child, mechanical ventilation is required and in this case tidal volumes are between 10 to 15 mL/kg and the minute volume is approximately 100mL/kg/min3.  The paediatric patient also has an immature tracheobronchial tree.  The developing respiratory system is relatively fragile and more prone to barotrauma than the adult.  Hypoxia is the commonest cause of cardiac arrest in the child1.

Cardiovascular
The circulating blood volume of the child is also different to the adult.  The child has a circulating blood volume of approximately 80ml/kg, whereas in the adult it is 70 ml/kg1.  The increased physiologic reserve of the paediatric patient allows for preservation of most vital signs in the normal range, even when the child is shocked1.  Pulse rates up to 160 may be normal in the neonate.  This figure decreases with age until it drops below 100 by the onset of adolescence.

Other considerations
Venous access is more difficult to achieve in the paediatric patient, and must always be secured prior to emplaning.  The retrieval team should also be aware that the infant urinary output is higher than that of the adult.  (2.0 mL/kg/hr in the infant decreasing to 1.0mL at age three to five years, and 0.5mL by adolescence1).  Paediatric patients also have different psychologic needs when compared to adults. An increased susceptibility to hypoxia
The anatomical and physiological differences between infants and adults are marked, and the response to the hypoxic environment encountered during flight is different3.  The susceptibility to hypoxia is most marked in newborns and infants in the first year of life.  Table 1 contains a summary of the factors increasing the susceptibility of infants and young children to hypoxaemia.
Hypobaric hypoxia of aeromedical retrieval
Atmospheric pressure falls in an approximately exponential manner with increasing altitude12.  With increasing altitude there will be a corresponding decrease in barometric pressure.  The barometric pressure at Mean Sea Level (MSL) in standard atmospheric conditions is 760mmHg, and this falls to 565mmHg at 8,000feet12.  Dalton’s Law of Partial Pressures states that each gas in a mixture exerts the same pressure as if it were present, alone, in the same volume13.  Oxygen partial pressure (PO2), or oxygen tension, is the portion of the total pressure that is exerted by the oxygen alone.  The PO2 difference between two areas determines the direction and rate of flow (diffusion) of oxygen molecules, including when the oxygen is in solution.  A PO2 gradient exists in different locations within the respiration cycle, allowing oxygen flow to occur, from regions with higher levels of PO2 to regions with lower levels of PO2 – this is called the oxygen cascade12.
At the maximum cabin altitude of 8,000 feet, the atmospheric pressure is 565 mm Hg, giving an atmospheric PO2 of 118 mm Hg.  This is equivalent to reducing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at sea level to 15.5%.  It can be seen that many of the anatomical and physiological parameters observed in the infant predispose them to an increased tendency to ventilation-perfusion mismatch.  This results in infants being particularly susceptible to hypoxaemic episodes14.

Respiratory considerations during aeromedical retrieval of the infant
Decreased surfactant
Pre-term infants will often have decreased levels of lung surfactant predisposing to atelectasis.  Atelectasis decreases ventilation, leading to a ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxia2.  Positive end-expiratory pressure may be necessary to overcome the tendency to atelectasis.  Aeromedical transfer of the neonate should be performed using dedicated equipment suited to the physiology and anatomy of the newborn.  In particular ventilators should have parameters that are appropriate for the patient, including safety valves to prevent pulmonary barotrauma during assisted ventilation.

Increased rib cage compliance
Neonates and young children display increased rib cage compliance2.  Negative intrathoracic pressure generated during caudal diaphragmatic excursion is thus less effective at inspiring a volume of air.  This is because the negative pressure generated is partly offset by a slight decrease in ribcage volume.  Aeromedical staff should also be aware that infants predominantly use their diaphragm for respiration.

Paradoxical inhibition of respiratory drive
In infants younger than one to two months of age, the normal stimulus to ventilation caused by hypoxia is sometimes followed by paradoxical inhibition of respiration2.  Infants, who may have a tendency to become hypoxic due to prematurity or concurrent lung infection, may display hypoventilation or apnoea when exposed to hypobaric hypoxia during aeromedical transfer.  Therefore, it is vitally important in very young infants that the aeromedical staff ensure their patient is not exposed to hypobaric hypoxic conditions.  Methods to minimise this would include: the use of supplemental oxygen to increase the FiO2, the maintenance of a sea-level cabin pressure, and by ensuring there are no intervals of disconnection of supplemental oxygen – especially when emplaning and deplaning the neonate.

Increased preponderance of muscular arterioles in pulmonary vasculature
Exposure to hypoxic conditions, such as those encountered during aeromedical transfer will result in vasoconstriction of the pulmonary vessels4.  In early infancy this leads to a marked decrease in perfusion of the respiratory system.  The raised pulmonary vascular resistance may lead to increased right to left shunting through a patent foramen ovale, resulting in non-oxygenated blood returning to the systemic circulation.  In addition, exposure to hypoxia during flight may prolong the patency of the ductus arteriousus3.

Increased airway reactivity in response to hypoxia
Some infants display increased airway reactivity when exposed to hypoxic conditions5,6.  This reactivity actually increases following birth, to the point where at 26 weeks of age an infant shows greater desaturation upon histamine challenge when compared to a four week old neonate7.  Aeromedical transfer of an infant with bronchiolitis (which is characterised by bronchoconstriction) is thus made particularly hazardous if the infant is exposed to hypoxia. For this reason hypoxic exposure should be minimised as much as possible.

End expiratory lung volume approximates closing volume
Closing volume (CV) is the volume of gas in the lungs in excess of the residual volume (RV) at the time when small airways in the dependent portions of the lungs close during maximal exhalation. The closing capacity (CC) is equal to CV plus RV.  The closing volume is greater in young children in whom the elastic supporting structure of the lung is incompletely developed.  Infants are at greater risk for atelectasis as airway closure can occur even during tidal breathing15.  A complete explanation can be found in Fact Box A6, 16.

Decreased airway diameter
The internal diameter of the airway in infants is proportionally smaller than the adult.  During the first two months of life, when most physical parameters in the newborn are increasing rapidly (such as weight and length), the conductance of the airway actually decreases9.  From the age of two months conductance begins to increase.  Any reduction in airway diameter will effect a dramatic decrease in ventilation10.  This is because resistance to flow is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the radius of the airway (Poiseuille’s equation)13.  Aeromedical staff should be aware that airway compromise in the neonate and infant can occur precipitously due to this physical fact.  Aeromedical staff should have appropriate equipment available, such as suction devices to help clear an airway that suddenly becomes occluded.

Fewer alveoli
The respiratory system of the newborn displays significantly different morphology to the adult system.  In particular there are proportionally fewer alveoli in the infant11.  This can predispose to ventilation – perfusion mismatch, and thus hypoxia.

Foetal haemoglobin Most types of normal haemoglobin, including haemoglobin A, haemoglobin A2, haemoglobin S, and haemoglobin F, are tetramers composed of four protein subunits and four heme prosthetic groups.  Whereas adult haemoglobin is composed of two alpha and two beta subunits, foetal haemoglobin is composed of two alpha and two gamma subunits, commonly denoted as α2γ2.  Because of its presence in foetal haemoglobin, the gamma subunit is commonly called the “foetal” haemoglobin subunit.  Foetal haemoglobin (HbF) persists in significant amounts up to three months of age and shifts the oxygen dissociation curve to the left3.  The effect of foetal haemoglobin on the oxygen dissociation curve will be to enhance loading of oxygen in an hypoxic environment, and possibly to decrease unloading in peripheral tissues17.

Barometric pressure changes
The volume of a fixed mass of gas is inversely proportional to the pressure to which it is subjected (Boyle’s law).  At the highest cabin altitude usually encountered in aeromedical retrieval flight (8,000 feet), gas will increase in volume by approximately 30 per cent.  Gas trapped in a body cavity of a paediatric AME patient will expand at altitude and restrict diaphragmatic motion, compromising respiration and leading to hypoxaemia.  Aeromedical staff should consider placing an orogastric or nasogastric tube to decompress the stomach prior to flight.

Hypoxia secondary to congenital pulmonary anomalies and cyanotic heart disease
Infants with congenital pulmonary anomalies are at risk for the development of spontaneous pneumothorax during flight3.  In the paediatric AME patient there may be no obvious symptoms of a developing pneumothorax other than the development of unexplained variations in vital signs and abnormal movements.  Paediatric AME staff should thus be vigilant for sudden changes in vital signs, and be aware of the risk of pneumothorax.

Physical phenomena causing hypoxia
The low humidity found in aircraft cabins can increase airway reactivity in some patients.  In addition, bronchial secretions may thicken, leading to mucous plugging and atelectasis3.  The resultant ventilation-perfusion mismatch will lead to hypoxia.  Mucous plugging is of special concern in paediatric patients with bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis.
Helicopters produce more stress from vibration and noise than do fixed wing aircraft.  Excess vibration may particularly disturb the sick neonate, producing hypoxaemia, apnoea, or bradycardia18.  Temperature regulation should be maintained, as hypothermia and shivering increase oxygen consumption, and may aggravate metabolic acidosis and hypoglycaemia in sick infants.  As humidity decreases with altitude, additional means to moisten the inspired air should be provided; for example by using nebulised saline.  This will help temperature control, fluid balance, and reduce the tenacity of secretions.
As infants are obligate nose breathers any obstruction to the nasal passages will cause respiratory distress.  The developing trachea is prone to kinking and extension of the neck may lead to airway compromise and subsequent hypoxaemia.  The child should be placed with the shoulders slightly supported.  The trachea is also relatively short in the infant and it is easy for the operator to intubate the right main bronchus, with significant complications and hypoventilation3.

Management of the paediatric aeromedical retrieval
Background considerations

It is important that the aeromedical staff are aware of the physical, physiological and psychological stressors of flight.  In addition to hypoxia, the aeromedical team should also consider other stressors, including the expansion of trapped gasses, noise, vibration and motion.  The personnel planning an aeromedical transfer of the paediatric patient should have an holistic approach to the transfer.  This approach should consider all aspects of the transfer, including clinical, flight and aeromedical staff.  Secondary aeromedical transfer should only occur if it is likely to improve the patient’s clinical outcome19,20.  Further , the transfer should be undertaken in a manner that does not jeopardise the level and quality of care being given.21,22.
There are published guidelines for the expected standard of care during transportation, with a typical guideline being that provided by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Australasian College of Emergency Medicine23.

Paediatric patient assessment & overcoming hypoxia
In paediatric patients who are receiving supplemental oxygen, the fractional inspired oxygen concentration may be increased to account for the hypoxia at altitude.  This can be titrated during the journey by continuous pulse oximetry24.  Another complementary technique is to lower cabin altitudes (maximum cabin pressure of 3700 feet) to ensure haemoglobin SO2 levels of at least 80%.  In infants who are ventilated, it would also be possible to increase the positive end expiratory pressure to help oxygenation.  There are a variety of formulae available for predicting hypoxaemia at altitude and these are shown in Fact Box B3,25,26.  An alternative method for pre-flight assessment involves hypoxic challenge testing.  A convenient method to do this is by titration of the extra oxygen requirement of the infant or young child via whole body plethysmography in a body box, as described in Fact Box C27.

Communication and documentation
Prior to departure, communication between the originating medical facility and the receiving facility is essential.  The aeromedical staff should be very clear as to the nature of their tasking, and in addition, communication between the aeromedical staff is important for crew resource management reasons as it helps to minimise error.  Documentation should always accompany the paediatric patient.  The documents should be a complete summary of the care to date, and importantly there should also be a summary for rapid reference.  Recorded observations should be copied and provided to the receiving medical facility.

Selection of aeromedical staff and training
For the aeromedical transfer of paediatric patients, dedicated paediatric retrieval teams have been shown to be safer and more effective than standard aeromedical teams28,29  The UK Paediatric Intensive Care Society recommends the use of dedicated paediatric retrieval teams30.

Pre-transfer care
Ideally paediatric patients should be physiologically stable prior to transfer31,32-34.  This requires careful pre-transfer assessment and optimisation of the child’s status.  Lack of anticipation of potential events during the transfer can adversely affect outcome32,35.  Appropriate aeromedical equipment including monitoring devices, pumps, defibrillators, ventilators and humidicribs should be prepared and checked prior to departure.  The aeromedical service should have a system in place so these activities are in a high state of preparedness at all times.  Power sources should be examined closely and redundancies calculated for power and oxygen supplies.  The parents of the child can be of enormous assistance to the team caring for the paediatric patient.  It is important to be inclusive and considerate of their needs at all times.  It is also worthwhile for your Desk Officer to ensure that Customs and Quarantine have been informed of the planned mission.  Medical and nursing staff should have appropriate medical indemnity insurance for the location and type of activity they are underatking31.

During transport
With good preparation and planning there should be little requirement for any active intervention during the flight itself3.  The patient should be continually reassessed en-route, with the level of monitoring and the frequency of measurement of physiological parameters at least the same or greater than the originating medical facility.  The paediatric patient should be monitored with continuous pulse oximetry and ECG.  In addition, intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and temperature at an appropriate interval is indicated.  For the ventilated patient a capnographic tracing is recommended.  The equipment and therapeutic schedule should be extensive and appropriate for a paediatric patient.  The schedule should be stowed in a logical and accessible manner and consumables kept in-date.

Post-transfer care
The paediatric aeromedical patient remains the responsibility of the transferring team until formal nursing and medical handover has occurred.  Ideally this should be at the destination medical facility.  The patient should then be reassessed using the ABC method.  Monitors and ventilators are then changed to the receiving facility equipment.  At this stage it is vital that all connections, lines and tubes are carefully re-evaluated.  Documents are then handed over to the receiving medical facility – including blood results and radiographs.  It is important to introduce the parents of the paediatric patient to the receiving staff.  A post-mission debrief should occur amongst the aeromedical team.

Conclusion
Hypoxia presents one of the greatest challenges when performing aeromedical transfer of the paediatric patient.  An appreciation of the anatomical and physiological differences that pre-dispose the infant to hypoxaemia should be requisite knowledge for aeromedical staff.  Aeromedical transfer of paediatric patients should be performed whenever possible by dedicated paediatric transfer teams.  These teams should have equipment and therapeutic schedules appropriate to the paediatric patient.  The aeromedical transfer will be conducted with greater safety and efficiency for patient and staff if crew resource management practices are adopted.  This includes, but is not limited to, planning and preparation, communication, briefings, error minimisation and mitigation and thorough equipment checks.  Every attempt should be made to ensure the infant being transported is not exposed to any hypoxic interval – especially during those critical stages involving changes of oxygen and ventilators, and emplaning and deplaning.

Author Information

References

1.    American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. ATLS 7th Edn.2004. 243-62 2.    Samuels M. The effects of flight and altitude. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004;89:448-455 3.    Martin T. Aeromedical transportation: A Clinical Guide. 2nd edition. Ashgate 2006. 193-208 4.    Voelkel NF. Mechanisms of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:1186–95.[Medline] 5.    Teague WG, Pian MS, Heldt GP, et al. An acute reduction in the fraction of inspired oxygen increases airway constriction in infants with chronic lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:861–5.[Medline] 6.    Tay-Uyboco JS, Kwiatkowski K, Cates DB, et al. Hypoxic airway constriction in infants of very low birth weight recovering from moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr 1989;115:456–9.[Medline] 7.    Young S, Geelhoed GC, Stick SM, et al. The effect of age on oxygen desaturation during histamine inhalation challenge in normal infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 1993;16:158–62.[Medline] 8.    Mortola JP, Fisher JT, Smith B, et al. Dynamics of breathing in infants. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exercise Physiol 1982;52:1209–15. 9.    Martinez FD. Sudden infant death syndrome and small airway occlusion: facts and a hypothesis. Pediatrics 1991;87:190–8. 10.    Martinez FD, Taussig LM, Morgan WJ. Infants with upper respiratory illnesses have significant reductions in maximal expiratory flow. Pediatr Pulmonol 1990;9:91–5.[Medline] 11.    Hislop AA, Haworth SG. Airway size and structure in the normal fetal and infant lung and the effect of premature delivery and artificial ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:1717–26.[Medline] 12.    Ernsting, Nicholson, Rainford. Aviation Medicine 4th edition. Hodder Arnold 2006. 3-12 13.    RAAF Institute of Aviation Medicine. Aviation Medical Officer Course 2006 14.    Poets CF, Samuels MP, Southall DP. Potential role of intrapulmonary shunting in the genesis of hypoxemic episodes in infants and young children. Pediatrics 1992;90:385–91. 15.    Magnusson L, Spahn D. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003, Vol. 91, No. 1 61-72. 16.    Serafini G, Cornara G, Cavalloro F, et al. Pulmonary atelectasis during paediatric anaesthesia: CT scan evaluation and effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 225–8[Medline] 17.    Letsky EA. Anaemia in the newborn. In: Rennie JM, Roberton NRC, eds. Textbook of neonatology. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1999: 806–33. 18.    Miller C. The physiologic effects of air transport on the neonate. Neonatal Network–J Neonatal Nursing 1994;13:7–10. 19.    Whiteley S, Gray A, McHugh P, et al. On behalf of the Council of the Intensive Care Society. Guidelines for the transport of the critically ill adult. London: Intensive Care Society, 2002 20.    The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring. London: The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, 2000. 21.    Pe aloza D, Arias-Stella J, Sime F, et al. The heart and pulmonary circulation in children at high altitudes. Pediatrics 1964;34:568–82. 22.    Sime F, Banchero N, Penaloza D, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in children born and living at high altitudes. Am J Cardiol 1963;11:143–9.[Medline] 23.    Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Australasian College fro Emergency Medicine.  Joint Statement on Minimum Standards for Transport of the Critically ill.  1992 (revised 1996). ANZCA, St Kilda Road Melbourne Vic., Aust. 24.    Macnab AJ, Vachon J, Susak LE, et al. In-flight stabilization of oxygen saturation by control of altitude for severe respiratory insufficiency. Aviat Space Environ Med 1990;61:829–32.[Medline] 25.    Dillard TA, Berg BW, Rajagopal KR, et al. Hypoxaemia during air travel in patients with COPD. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:362–7.[Medline] 26.    Gong H, Tashkin DP, Lee EY, et al. Hypoxia-altitude simulation test. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:980–6.[Medline] 27.    Air Travel Working Party: Coker  K,Boldy D, et al.  British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee.  Managing passengers with respiratory disease planning air travel: British Thoracic Society recommendations.  Thorax 2002;57:289-304 28.    Edge WE, Kanter R, Weigle GM, et al. Reduction of morbidity in interhospital transport by specialized paediatric staff. Crit Care Med 1994;22:1186–91.[Medline] 29.    Britto J, Nadel S, Maconochie I, et al. Morbidity and severity of illness during interhospital transfer: impact of a specialised paediatric team. BMJ 1995;311:836–9. 30.    Paediatric Intensive Care Society. Standards for paediatric intensive care, including standards of practice for the transport of the critically ill child. London: PICS, 1996 31.    Whiteley S, Gray A, McHugh P, et al. On behalf of the Council of the Intensive Care Society. Guidelines for the transport of the critically ill adult. London: Intensive Care Society, 2002 32.    Advanced Life Support Group. Safe transfer and retrieval. The practical approach. London: BMJ Books, 2002 33.    Ridley SA, Wright IH, Rogers PN. Secondary transport of critically ill patients. Hospital Update 1990:289–300. 34.    Runcie CJ, Reeve W, Reidy J, et al. Secondary transport of the critically ill adult. Clin Intensive Care 1991;2:217–25.[Medline] 35.    Macartney I, Nightingale P. Transfer of the critically ill. Br J Anaesth CEPD reviews 2001;1:12–15.

Acknowledgements

Reader Feedback